Boards that keep evaluating are boards that keep improving
Boards that evaluate their performance repeatedly tend to get better.
Boards that evaluate their performance repeatedly tend to get better.
A significant new contention on the board’s role in CEO succession has been published and deserves exploration.
by Steve PellAcross 155 boards in the BoardOutlook 2025 benchmark pool, approximately four in ten directors (39%) name enhancing executive talent and succession as a top priority for driving value creation over ...
by Steve PellSharp, practical thinking on board performance — free, once a month, no noise.
It has never been more difficult to be a director. In today’s governance environment, non-executive directors face ...
by BoardOutlookIn almost all cases, the management team should participate in a board review process. The board impacts the business ...
by Steve PellRather than being seen as interventionist, deep dives should be seen as critical when a board is approving unfamiliar ...
by Jane HemstritchIn times of crisis many boards will be forced to revisit the line between board and management. When survival is on the ...
by Steve PellIt is essential practice for a board to endorse a statement of risk appetite that sets out, for each of the main ...
by BoardOutlookBoards, of necessity, operate at a high level and don’t have time for deep or detailed work. They rely on committees to ...
by BoardOutlookTo help Directors who are considering a change in the CEO role, we’ve published this comprehensive checklist to prompt ...
by BoardOutlookEverybody is talking about disruption. We’re in an agile economy. It’s easy to imagine we’re at constant risk of being ...
by Russell YardleyFew areas are as contentious as the role of the board in strategy. Some boards delegate strategy to management and ...
by BoardOutlook