Boards that keep evaluating are boards that keep improving
Boards that evaluate their performance repeatedly tend to get better.
Boards that evaluate their performance repeatedly tend to get better.
A significant new contention on the board’s role in CEO succession has been published and deserves exploration.
by Steve PellAcross 155 boards in the BoardOutlook 2025 benchmark pool, approximately four in ten directors (39%) name enhancing executive talent and succession as a top priority for driving value creation over ...
by Steve PellSharp, practical thinking on board performance — free, once a month, no noise.
When monitoring change management or major project delivery, too many NEDs are primarily focused on the budget and ...
by Jane HemstritchWhen mainstream comedians write comedy sketches about Zoom that are trending on YouTube you know that COVID-19 changed ...
by Russell YardleyTechnology is integral to how we operate almost every aspect of business today. Yet almost every director has ...
by Susan OliverThere’s no doubt that Essendon Football Club’s (EFC) Supplements Program of 2012 was a mistake of the highest ...
by Lindsay TannerCorporate governance is rather like hospitality staff: when it’s good, you barely notice it’s there, but when it fails ...
by Susan OliverThere’s a strong case for Australian boards to have some form of worker participation
by Jane HemstritchIn Australia today almost every company follows a somewhat similar formula for executive remuneration. Rather than ...
by Peter HayNeither governance or guidance are the only thing a board should focus on - you can have too much of both. An effective ...
by Diane Smith-GanderDue to COVID-19 there was a need to move to different governance routines so much so it created almost a new governance ...
by Diane Smith-Gander