Boards that keep evaluating are boards that keep improving
Boards that evaluate their performance repeatedly tend to get better.
Boards that evaluate their performance repeatedly tend to get better.
A significant new contention on the board’s role in CEO succession has been published and deserves exploration.
by Steve PellAcross 155 boards in the BoardOutlook 2025 benchmark pool, approximately four in ten directors (39%) name enhancing executive talent and succession as a top priority for driving value creation over ...
by Steve PellSharp, practical thinking on board performance — free, once a month, no noise.
How often a board should review its performance depends on a range of factors. Whilst the starting point is generally ...
by Allie GertzOver nearly forty-five years I’ve accumulated a wide array of leadership experience, both as a leader in my own right ...
by Lindsay TannerBoards have made great strides on pay in recent years. Executive remuneration is now scrutinised, modelled, linked to ...
by BoardOutlookToo many Australian companies use a one size fits all executive remuneration model - that doesn't reflect the needs or ...
by Jane HemstritchAn advisory board is very different to a legal board of directors. Whilst a legal board of directors has to meet ...
by Steve PellTo help boards who are confronting a crisis, we've published this comprehensive crisis management checklist. The ...
by Steve PellA powerful exercise for any company is to reimagine their strategy as if they were a technology company - imagine being ...
by Susan OliverWhen thinking about evaluating your board, there’s a range of alternatives. Most of these involve some combination of ...
by Allie GertzEvery director brings their own experience and ideas to the table. But it’s not always easy to stand behind your ...
by Diane Smith-Gander